Prostitution and American GIs

By Rina Jimenez-David
April 5, 2006

In 2003, the Office of the Inspector General in the US Department of Defense initiated a global assessment of "US military activities that promote and facilitate sex trafficking." The assessment was conducted in two phases, first in South Korea and then in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo.

In South Korea, which plays host to several American bases, "Courtesy Patrols" (a euphemism for military police or MPs) were found to be "friendly" with bar owners, employees and patrons, giving the impression that there was "official imprimatur" on activities in the clubs, including US military personnel paying "bar fines" so they could take out girls for a night.

The report on Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, according to an update issued by Equality Now, an organization that promotes women's human rights, found that "Because there is no military standard that directly addresses patronization of prostitutes and other activities associated with human trafficking, criminal prosecution of these activities under military law is rendered more difficult.

We believe that correcting these weaknesses is consistent with the 'abolitionist approach to trafficking in persons' or zero-tolerance policy with respect to US government employees and contractor personnel stationed abroad who engage in trafficking in persons set forth in the 2003 National Security Presidential Directive 22, which further states, 'the United States Government opposes prostitution and any related activities'."

The "zero-tolerance" policy was further reinforced in 2004, with a defense department memorandum stating, among other things, that the department "opposes prostitution and any related activities that may contribute to the phenomenon of trafficking in persons as inherently harmful and dehumanizing."

That same year, General LaPorte, the commander of the US Forces in Korea (USFK) testified before Congress and averred his command was implementing the zero-tolerance policy. Since January 2003, said the general, the USFK had ordered disciplinary action on five servicemen for soliciting (or patronizing) prostitution, and prosecuted 398 servicemen for related offenses such as violating curfew and trespassing on off-limit establishments.

Last Oct. 14, US President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13387, amending the "Manual for Courts-Martial" to specifically list "patronizing a prostitute" as a violation of the Code of Military Justice. US military personnel will have committed an offense if they "compelled, induced, enticed or procured (a) person to engage in an act of sexual intercourse in exchange for monetary or other compensation."

But Equality Now's campaign for the implementation of a zero-tolerance policy continues. "The US military has not responded to repeated inquiries regarding any disciplinary action taken against US military personnel involving solicitation of prostitution," Equality Now reports. This, even as American soldiers continue to use women in prostitution in South Korea.

Recently, a Filipina bar worker won a judgment against a South Korean nightclub owner "for forcing her to have sex with US soldiers," Stars and Stripes, a US military newspaper, reported. Equality Now avers that "the failure of the US military effectively to enforce the law has been corroborated by women's organizations in South Korea."

Mwanwhile, reports Equality Now, the South Korean government has taken "significant measures" to combat trafficking and prostitution, but only after years of advocacy and lobbying by Korean NGOs, such as, the Korea Women's Associations United (KWAU).

Laws enacted in 2004-the "Act on the Punishment of Procuring Prostitution and Associated Acts" and the "Act on the Prevention of Prostitution and Protection of its Victims Thereof"-call for strict sanctions for trafficking and procuring prostitution. The second law also authorizes the establishment of assistance facilities and counseling centers, with an infrastructure of social, legal and medical support, for victims. "Under the new legislation," writes Equality Now, "victims of prostitution are defined as persons who are subject to various forms of coercion, including through drugs and debt, to sell sex. Victims of prostitution are not subject to punishment. Rather they are eligible for the assistance and counseling provided for in the law."

In the year since the laws have been passed, says Equality Now, the number of commercial sex establishments has decreased by 36.8 percent, according to figures provided by the Korean National Police Agency.

In an update sent to partners around the world Equality Now calls on everyone concerned about the issue to write to President Bush "welcoming EO 13387... specifically enumerating 'patronizing a prostitute' as a violation," while urging Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to strictly enforce this provision "noting that patronizing prostitution feeds the global demand for sex trafficking and noting reports that the law is not being effectively enforced."

Supporters are also urged to write South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and Minister of Justice Jung Bae-chun "thanking them for the efforts to create a new legal framework that recognizes and protects victims of prostitution while holding those who exploit them accountable"; and urging them "to ensure that the new laws are strictly enforced."

And while you're at it, you might want to write to President Macapagal-Arroyo and Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez urging them to show stronger resolve to uphold the national interest-as well as that of the accuser-in the Subic rape case.

SOUTHEAST ASIA

JAPAN

GREATER CHINA

KOREAS

SOUTH ASIA

CENTRAL ASIA

MIDDLE EAST

© 2005 Asian Sex Gazette.
Contact Us | About Us | Newsfeeds | Newsletters | Advertising


Terms of Use
 | Privacy Policy | DMCA Policy | Removal Policy 
Adult Industry | Adult Performers | Magazine Reviews | Movie Reviews |
Home | Central Asia | Greater China | Japan | Koreas | Middle East | South Asia | Southeast Asia